↓ Skip to main content

The Cats‐and‐Dogs test: A tool to identify visuoperceptual deficits in Parkinson's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Movement Disorders, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Cats‐and‐Dogs test: A tool to identify visuoperceptual deficits in Parkinson's disease
Published in
Movement Disorders, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/mds.27176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rimona S. Weil, Katerina Pappa, Rachel N. Schade, Anette E. Schrag, Bahador Bahrami, Dietrich S. Schwarzkopf, Sebastian J Crutch, Aidan G. O'Keeffe, Huw R. Morris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Other 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 19 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Psychology 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,970,462
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Movement Disorders
#1,936
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,798
of 327,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Disorders
#22
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.