↓ Skip to main content

The association between dietary factors and gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
Title
The association between dietary factors and gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0157-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle AJM Schoenaker, Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu, Gita D Mishra

Abstract

Dietary factors have been suggested to play a role in the prevention of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia, but inconsistent findings have been reported. A systematic review and meta-analyses were performed to synthesize evidence from observational studies of reproductive-aged women on the association between dietary factors and HDP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 305 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 17%
Student > Bachelor 47 15%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Researcher 16 5%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 91 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 96 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,570,989
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,897
of 3,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,088
of 251,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#48
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.