↓ Skip to main content

結核スクリーニングとしての抗酸菌塗抹検査導入の効果

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 102)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
結核スクリーニングとしての抗酸菌塗抹検査導入の効果
Published in
Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control, January 2016
DOI 10.4058/jsei.31.319
Authors

大森 優子, 松崎 晋一, 中島 雅子, 河井 利恵子, 岡田 克之, 桑島 信

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,880,964
of 25,652,464 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control
#12
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,802
of 401,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Infection Prevention and Control
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,652,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.