↓ Skip to main content

Deforestation trends and spatial modelling of its drivers in the dry temperate forests of northern Pakistan — A case study of Chitral

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mountain Science, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Deforestation trends and spatial modelling of its drivers in the dry temperate forests of northern Pakistan — A case study of Chitral
Published in
Journal of Mountain Science, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11629-013-2932-x
Authors

Khuram Shehzad, Faisal M. Qamer, M. S. R. Murthy, Sawaid Abbas, Laxmi D. Bhatta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 14%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#13,413,381
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#107
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,520
of 249,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them