| Title |
Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, April 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1008087114256 |
| Authors |
Janina Kwandrans, Pertti Eloranta, Barbara Kawecka, Krzysztof Wojtan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 78 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,873,876
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#146
of 2,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,611
of 32,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them