↓ Skip to main content

Effects of external qigong therapy on osteoarthritis of the knee

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Effects of external qigong therapy on osteoarthritis of the knee
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10067-008-0955-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin W Chen, Adam Perlman, Jason G. Liao, Alex Lam, Joy Staller, Leonard H. Sigal

Abstract

The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of external qigong therapy (EQT), a traditional Chinese medicine practice, in reducing pain and improving functionality of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). One hundred twelve adults with knee OA were randomized to EQT or sham treatment (control); 106 completed treatment and were analyzed. Two therapists performed EQT individually, five to six sessions in 3 weeks. The sham healer mimicked EQT for the same number of sessions and duration. Patients and examining physician were blinded. Primary outcomes were Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) pain and function; other outcomes included McGill Pain Questionnaire, time to walk 15 m, and range of motion squatting. Results of patients treated by the two healers were analyzed separately. Both treatment groups reported significant reduction in WOMAC scores after intervention. Patients treated by healer 2 reported greater reduction in pain (mean improvement -25.7 +/- 6.6 vs. -13.1 +/- 3.0; p < 0.01) and more improvement in functionality (-28.1 +/- 9.7 vs. -13.2 +/- 3.4; p < 0.01) than those in sham control and reduction in negative mood but not in anxiety or depression. Patients treated by healer 1 experienced improvement similar to control. The results of therapy persisted at 3 months follow-up for all groups. Mixed-effect models confirmed these findings with controlling for possible confounders. EQT might have a role in the treatment of OA, but our data indicate that all EQT healers are not equivalent. The apparent efficacy of EQT appears to be dependent on some quality of the healer. Further study on a larger scale with multiple EQT healers is necessary to determine the role (if any) of EQT in the treatment of OA and to identify differences in EQT techniques.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 10 17%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Psychology 7 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,312
of 2,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,527
of 81,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.