Title |
Trace elements in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-7-25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcello Tonelli, Natasha Wiebe, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Scott Klarenbach, Catherine Field, Braden Manns, Ravi Thadhani, John Gill, The Alberta Kidney Disease Network |
Abstract |
Hemodialysis patients are at risk for deficiency of essential trace elements and excess of toxic trace elements, both of which can affect health. We conducted a systematic review to summarize existing literature on trace element status in hemodialysis patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 151 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
Researcher | 16 | 10% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Student > Master | 9 | 6% |
Other | 37 | 24% |
Unknown | 39 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 44 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,397,563
of 24,312,464 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,176
of 3,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,132
of 100,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,312,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.