↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: A multi-stage genome-wide association study of uterine fibroids in African Americans

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Erratum to: A multi-stage genome-wide association study of uterine fibroids in African Americans
Published in
Human Genetics, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00439-017-1846-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacklyn N. Hellwege, Janina M. Jeff, Lauren A. Wise, C. Scott Gallagher, Melissa Wellons, Katherine E. Hartmann, Sarah F. Jones, Eric S. Torstenson, Scott Dickinson, Edward A. Ruiz-Narváez, Nadin Rohland, Alexander Allen, David Reich, Arti Tandon, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Nicholas Mancuso, Hae Kyung Im, David A. Hinds, Julie R. Palmer, Lynn Rosenberg, Joshua C. Denny, Dan M. Roden, Elizabeth A. Stewart, Cynthia C. Morton, Eimear E. Kenny, Todd L. Edwards, Digna R. Velez Edwards

Abstract

The article "A multi-stage genome-wide association study of uterine fibroids in African Americans", written by Jacklyn N. Hellwege, was originally published Online First without open access. After publication in volume 136, issue 10, page 1363-1373 the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an open access publication. Therefore, the copyright of the article has been changed to

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,956,881
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,501
of 2,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,788
of 323,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.