↓ Skip to main content

Failure modes for total ankle arthroplasty: a statistical analysis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Failure modes for total ankle arthroplasty: a statistical analysis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00402-014-2067-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Sadoghi, Grant Roush, Norbert Kastner, Andreas Leithner, Christof Sommitsch, Tarun Goswami

Abstract

It is imperative to understand the most common failure modes of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to appropriately allocate the resources, healthcare costs, enhancing surgical treatment methods, and improve design and longevity of the implant. The objective of this study was to investigate the primary mode or modes of failure (Loose talar component, loose tibial component, dislocation, instability, misalignment, deep infection, Fracture (near implant), Pain, defect polyethylene (PE), other, and missing information) of TAA implants, so these failure mode/modes can be targeted for future improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 43%
Engineering 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#952
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,303
of 231,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.