| Title |
Relation between tacticity and fiber diameter in melt-electrospinning of polypropylene
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fibers and Polymers, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12221-009-0275-6 |
| Authors |
Yosuke Kadomae, Yasuhide Maruyama, Masataka Sugimoto, Takashi Taniguchi, Kiyohito Koyama |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 34% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,202,382
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Fibers and Polymers
#40
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,215
of 109,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibers and Polymers
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them