You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The International Charter for Human Values in Healthcare: An interprofessional global collaboration to enhance values and communication in healthcare
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient Education & Counseling, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pec.2014.06.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Rider, Suzanne Kurtz, Diana Slade, H. Esterbrook Longmaid, Ming-Jung Ho, Jack Kwok-hung Pun, Suzanne Eggins, William T. Branch |
| Abstract |
The human dimensions of healthcare-core values and skilled communication necessary for every healthcare interaction-are fundamental to compassionate, ethical, and safe relationship-centered care. The objectives of this paper are to: describe the development of the International Charter for Human Values in Healthcare which delineates core values, articulate the role of skilled communication in enacting these values, and provide examples showing translation of the Charter's values into action. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 15% |
| Canada | 6 | 9% |
| Philippines | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 27 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 23% |
| Scientists | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 20% |
| Unknown | 69 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 15% |
| Unknown | 81 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#968,474
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Patient Education & Counseling
#94
of 4,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,182
of 242,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Education & Counseling
#6
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.