↓ Skip to main content

Proteinivorax hydrogeniformans sp. nov., an anaerobic, haloalkaliphilic bacterium fermenting proteinaceous compounds with high hydrogen production

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Proteinivorax hydrogeniformans sp. nov., an anaerobic, haloalkaliphilic bacterium fermenting proteinaceous compounds with high hydrogen production
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10482-017-0949-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yulia Boltyanskaya, Ekaterina Detkova, Nikolay Pimenov, Vadim Kevbrin

Abstract

A search for the organisms responsible for the degradation of biomass of primary producers in Tanatar lakes resulted in the isolation of a novel anaerobic, haloalkaliphilic microorganism, strain Z-710(T). The strain grows on proteinaceous substrates (peptides) but not on proteins. A rather limited range of substances of other classes can be utilised together with tryptone but not individually. An interesting physiological feature of the novel strain is a high capacity for hydrogen production (up to 30% v/v) during proteolytic fermentation. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity revealed that the organism can be assigned to the previously described genus Proteinivorax. According to its physiological features and the low DNA-DNA hybridisation level of the strain with the type strain of the only previously described Proteinivorax species-Proteinivorax tanatarense Z-910(T)-strain Z-710(T) is described here as representing a novel species with the name Proteinivorax hydrogeniformans sp. nov. The type strain is Z-710(T) (= DSM 102085(T) = VKM B-3042(T)).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,775,422
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#198
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,876
of 323,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#5
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.