↓ Skip to main content

Who Approves Fraudulence? Configurational Causes of Consumers’ Unethical Judgments

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Who Approves Fraudulence? Configurational Causes of Consumers’ Unethical Judgments
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3703-3
Authors

Alexander Leischnig, Arch G. Woodside

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Professor 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 19 31%
Engineering 5 8%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,969,850
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,095
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,370
of 322,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.