↓ Skip to main content

Broad-spectrum bioactivities of silver nanoparticles: the emerging trends and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
352 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
Title
Broad-spectrum bioactivities of silver nanoparticles: the emerging trends and future prospects
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00253-013-5473-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahendra Rai, Kateryna Kon, Avinash Ingle, Nelson Duran, Stefania Galdiero, Massimiliano Galdiero

Abstract

There are alarming reports of growing microbial resistance to all classes of antimicrobial agents used against different infections. Also the existing classes of anticancer drugs used against different tumours warrant the urgent search for more effective alternative agents for treatment. Broad-spectrum bioactivities of silver nanoparticles indicate their potential to solve many microbial resistance problems up to a certain extent. The antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiprotozoal, acaricidal, larvicidal, lousicidal and anticancer activities of silver nanoparticles have recently attracted the attention of scientists all over the world. The aim of the present review is to discuss broad-spectrum multifunctional activities of silver nanoparticles and stress their therapeutic potential as smart nanomedicine. Much emphasis has been dedicated to the antimicrobial and anticancer potential of silver nanoparticles showing their promising characteristics for treatment, prophylaxis and control of infections, as well as for diagnosis and treatment of different cancer types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 362 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 17%
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Student > Master 36 10%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 52 14%
Unknown 121 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 13%
Chemistry 35 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 7%
Materials Science 17 5%
Other 73 20%
Unknown 135 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,461,226
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#222
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,795
of 314,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.