| Title |
Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-010-1871-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fiona D. Zeeb, Stan B. Floresco, Catharine A. Winstanley |
| Abstract |
Individual differences in impulsive decision-making may be critical determinants of vulnerability to impulse control disorders and substance abuse, yet little is known of their biological or behavioural basis. The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has been heavily implicated in the regulation of impulsive decision-making. However, lesions of the OFC in rats have both increased and decreased impulsivity in delay-discounting paradigms, where impulsive choice is defined as the selection of small immediate over larger delayed rewards. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 233 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 29% |
| Researcher | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 71 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 49 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,633
of 5,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,045
of 95,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#36
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.