↓ Skip to main content

Biologic Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine: Mechanisms of In vivo Remodeling

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Biologic Scaffolds for Regenerative Medicine: Mechanisms of In vivo Remodeling
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10439-014-1103-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Londono, Stephen F. Badylak

Abstract

Successful regenerative medicine strategies for functional tissue reconstruction include the in situ placement of acellular materials composed of the extracellular matrix (ECM) or individual components of the ECM. The composition and ultrastructure of these materials vary depending on multiple factors including the tissue source and species from which the materials are harvested, the methods of manufacture, the efficiency of decellularization, post-processing modifications such as chemical cross-linking or solubilization, and the methods of terminal sterilization. Appropriately configured materials have the ability to modulate different stages of the healing response by inducing a shift from a process of inflammation and scar tissue formation to one of constructive remodeling and functional tissue restoration. The events that facilitate such a dramatic change during the biomaterial-host interaction are complex and necessarily involve both the immune system and mechanisms of stem cell recruitment, growth, and differentiation. The present manuscript reviews the composition of biologic scaffolds, the methods and recommendations for manufacture, the mechanisms of the biomaterial-host interaction, and the clinical application of this regenerative medicine approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 21%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 64 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 43 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 12%
Materials Science 10 4%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 75 29%