↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacology of Traumatic Brain Injury: Where Is the “Golden Bullet”?

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Pharmacology of Traumatic Brain Injury: Where Is the “Golden Bullet”?
Published in
Molecular Medicine, November 2008
DOI 10.2119/2008-00050.beauchamp
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Beauchamp, Haitham Mutlak, Wade R. Smith, Esther Shohami, Philip F. Stahel

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a major health care problem and a significant socioeconomic challenge worldwide. In the United States alone, approximately 1.5 million patients are affected each year, and the mortality of severe TBI remains as high as 35%-40%. These statistics underline the urgent need for efficient treatment modalities to improve posttraumatic morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in basic and clinical research as well as improved neurological intensive care in recent years, no specific pharmacological therapy for TBI is available that would improve the outcome of these patients. Understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the pathophysiological events after TBI has resulted in the identification of new potential therapeutic targets. Nevertheless, the extrapolation from basic research data to clinical application in TBI patients has invariably failed, and results from prospective clinical trials are disappointing. We review the published prospective clinical trials on pharmacological treatment modalities for TBI patients and outline future promising therapeutic avenues in the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Researcher 20 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 48 26%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 13%
Neuroscience 20 11%
Psychology 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 47 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,796,119
of 23,873,907 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#190
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,406
of 94,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them