↓ Skip to main content

Relativistic Fluid Dynamics: Physics for Many Different Scales

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Citations

dimensions_citation
261 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Relativistic Fluid Dynamics: Physics for Many Different Scales
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, January 2007
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2007-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nils Andersson, Gregory L. Comer

Abstract

The relativistic fluid is a highly successful model used to describe the dynamics of many-particle, relativistic systems. It takes as input basic physics from microscopic scales and yields as output predictions of bulk, macroscopic motion. By inverting the process, an understanding of bulk features can lead to insight into physics on the microscopic scale. Relativistic fluids have been used to model systems as "small" as heavy ions in collisions, and as large as the Universe itself, with "intermediate" sized objects like neutron stars being considered along the way. The purpose of this review is to discuss the mathematical and theoretical physics underpinnings of the relativistic (multiple) fluid model. We focus on the variational principle approach championed by Brandon Carter and his collaborators, in which a crucial element is to distinguish the momenta that are conjugate to the particle number density currents. This approach differs from the "standard" text-book derivation of the equations of motion from the divergence of the stress-energy tensor in that one explicitly obtains the relativistic Euler equation as an "integrability" condition on the relativistic vorticity. We discuss the conservation laws and the equations of motion in detail, and provide a number of (in our opinion) interesting and relevant applications of the general theory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
Germany 3 2%
Canada 3 2%
Colombia 2 1%
India 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 138 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 33%
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Professor 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 115 72%
Engineering 8 5%
Mathematics 6 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,234,379
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#86
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,277
of 172,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them