Title |
A list of the 70 species of Australian ticks; diagnostic guides to and species accounts of Ixodes holocyclus (paralysis tick), Ixodes cornuatus (southern paralysis tick) and Rhipicephalus australis (Australian cattle tick); and consideration of the place of Australia in the evolution of ticks with comments on four controversial ideas
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal for Parasitology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.08.008 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen C. Barker, Alan R. Walker, Dayana Campelo |
Abstract |
Seventy species of ticks are known from Australia: 14 soft ticks (family Argasidae) and 56 hard ticks (family Ixodidae). Sixteen of the 70 ticks in Australia may feed on humans and domestic animals (Barker and Walker 2014). The other 54 species of ticks in Australia feed only on wild mammals, reptiles and birds. At least 12 of the species of ticks in Australian also occur in Papua New Guinea. We use an image-matching system much like the image-matching systems of field guides to birds and flowers to identify Ixodes holocyclus (paralysis tick), Ixodes cornuatus (southern paralysis tick) and Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) australis (Australian cattle tick). Our species accounts have reviews of the literature on I. holocyclus (paralysis tick) from the first paper on the biology of an Australian tick by Bancroft (1884), on paralysis of dogs by I. holocyclus, to papers published recently, and of I. cornuatus (southern paralysis tick). We comment on four controversial questions in the evolutionary biology of ticks: (i) were labyrinthodont amphibians in Australia in the Devonian the first hosts of soft, hard and nuttalliellid ticks?; (ii) are the nuttalliellid ticks the sister-group to the hard ticks or the soft ticks?; (iii) is Nuttalliella namaqua the missing link between the soft and hard ticks?; and (iv) the evidence for a lineage of large bodied parasitiform mites (ticks plus the holothyrid mites plus the opiliocarid mites). |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 5 | 38% |
United States | 4 | 31% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 46% |
Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 35% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 21 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |