↓ Skip to main content

Conduct problems trajectories and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
Conduct problems trajectories and psychosocial outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00787-017-1053-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonardo Bevilacqua, Daniel Hale, Edward D. Barker, Russell Viner

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that youth who follow the early onset persistent (EOP), adolescent-onset (AO) and childhood-limited (CL) trajectories of conduct problems show varying patterns of health, mental health, educational, and social outcomes in adulthood. However, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis on outcomes associated with different conduct problems trajectories. We systematically reviewed the literature of longitudinal studies considering outcomes of three conduct problems trajectories: EOP, AO, and CL compared with individuals with low levels of conduct problems (low). We performed a series of meta-analyses comparing each trajectory to the low group for eight different outcomes in early adulthood or later. Thirteen studies met our inclusion criteria. Outcomes were mental health (depression), cannabis use, alcohol use, self-reported aggression, official records of antisocial behaviour, poor general health, poor education, and poor employment. Overall, EOP individuals showed significant higher risk of poor outcome followed by AO individuals, CL individuals, and finally participants in the low group. All conduct problems trajectories showed higher risk of poor psychosocial outcomes compared to the low group, but the magnitude of risk differed across trajectories, with a general trend for the EOP to perform significantly worse, followed by the AO and CL. Early intervention is recommended across domains to maximise likelihood of desistance from antisocial behaviour and improvement on several psychosocial outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Master 23 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 76 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 90 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,304,883
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#279
of 1,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,238
of 336,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#4
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.