↓ Skip to main content

Targeting Mucus Hypersecretion: New Therapeutic Opportunities for COPD?

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Targeting Mucus Hypersecretion: New Therapeutic Opportunities for COPD?
Published in
Drugs, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40265-014-0235-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clémence Martin, Justine Frija-Masson, Pierre-Régis Burgel

Abstract

Airway mucus has a key role in protective innate immune responses, but excessive mucus production and secretion in proximal and in distal airways are associated with disabling symptoms (cough and sputum), lung function decline, exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cellular and molecular mechanisms leading to mucin production and secretion have largely been identified using cultured epithelial cells and animal models. Cigarette smoke and microbial products are potent triggers of mucin production, which involves recognition of specific molecular patterns by cognate receptors and activation of metalloproteases at the epithelial cell surface, leading to epidermal growth factor receptor activation and mucin mRNA and protein synthesis. After mucin synthesis has occurred, mucins are tightly packed into intracytoplasmic granules. Many stimuli induce secretion of mucin granules from epithelial cells, but neutrophil serine proteases are the most potent inducers of mucin secretion. Neutrophils recruited to the airway epithelium also promote mucin production via neutrophil proteases and oxidative stress. Several drugs currently available for the treatment of COPD patients reduced mucus hypersecretion in preclinical models relevant to COPD, but their effects on mucus hypersecretion in humans have not been assessed. Testing the effects of these drugs and of novel molecules designed for reducing mucus production and/or secretion will require performing specifically designed clinical trials. These trials will be necessary to explore the hypothesis that reducing mucus hypersecretion is beneficial in COPD patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 24%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,920,163
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#2,599
of 3,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,608
of 227,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.