↓ Skip to main content

Co-Brooding and Co-Reflection as Differential Predictors of Depressive Symptoms and Friendship Quality in Adolescents: Investigating the Moderating Role of Gender

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Co-Brooding and Co-Reflection as Differential Predictors of Depressive Symptoms and Friendship Quality in Adolescents: Investigating the Moderating Role of Gender
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10964-017-0746-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margot Bastin, Janne Vanhalst, Filip Raes, Patricia Bijttebier

Abstract

Co-rumination has been shown advantageous for friendship quality, but disadvantageous for mental health. Recently, two components have been distinguished, with co-brooding predicting increases in depressive symptoms and co-reflection decreases. The current study aimed to replicate these findings and investigated whether both components also show differential relations with friendship quality. Gender was investigated as a moderator. Path analyses were used on data of 313 adolescents aged 9-17 (50.5% girls). Co-brooding was related to more concurrent and prospective depressive symptoms in girls. Co-reflection predicted less concurrent and prospective depressive symptoms in girls and higher concurrent positive friendship quality for boys and girls. This study underscores the value of studying co-rumination components and suggests that boys and girls in this context differ in their pathways towards depression.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Unspecified 11 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 46%
Unspecified 11 15%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 23%