↓ Skip to main content

3D modelling of dreissenid mussel impacts on phytoplankton in a large lake supports the nearshore shunt hypothesis and the importance of wind-driven hydrodynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Sciences, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
3D modelling of dreissenid mussel impacts on phytoplankton in a large lake supports the nearshore shunt hypothesis and the importance of wind-driven hydrodynamics
Published in
Aquatic Sciences, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00027-014-0369-0
Authors

Astrid N. Schwalb, Damien Bouffard, Leon Boegman, Luis Leon, Jennifer G. Winter, Lewis A. Molot, Ralph E. H. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Engineering 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#528
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,706
of 252,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.