| Title |
A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3816-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ewout A. Arkenbout, Paul W. J. Henselmans, Filip Jelínek, Paul Breedveld |
| Abstract |
Since the advent of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), a variety of multitasking platforms have been under development with the objective to allow for bimanual surgical tasks to be performed. These instruments show large differences in construction, enabled degrees of freedom (DOF), and control aspects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 66 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 35 | 52% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,786,093
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,565
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,887
of 252,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#64
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.