↓ Skip to main content

Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Optimize Cefotaxime Dosing Regimen in Critically Ill Children

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Population Pharmacokinetic Model to Optimize Cefotaxime Dosing Regimen in Critically Ill Children
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40262-017-0602-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agathe Béranger, Mehdi Oualha, Saïk Urien, Mathieu Genuini, Sylvain Renolleau, Radia Aboura, Déborah Hirt, Claire Heilbronner, Julie Toubiana, Jean-Marc Tréluyer, Sihem Benaboud

Abstract

During sepsis, optimal plasma antibiotic concentrations are mandatory. Modifications of pharmacokinetic parameters could lead to low drug concentrations and therefore, insufficient therapeutic levels. The aim of this study was to build a population pharmacokinetic model for cefotaxime and its metabolite desacetylcefotaxime in order to optimize individual dosing regimens for critically ill children. All children aged < 18 years, weighing more than 2.5 kg, and receiving intermittent cefotaxime infusions were included in this study. Cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetics were described using the non-linear mixed-effect modeling software MONOLIX, and Monte Carlo simulations were used to optimize dosing regimen in order to maintain serum concentrations above the target concentration (defined at 2 mg·L(-1)) throughout the dosing interval. We included 49 children with a median (range) postnatal age of 23.7 (0.2-229) months, and median body weight (range) of 10.9 (2.5-68) kg. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination adequately described the data. Median (range) values for cefotaxime clearance, desacetylcefotaxime clearance, and volume of distribution were 0.97 (0.3-7.1) L·h(-1), 3.2 (0.6-16.3) L·h(-1), and 0.3 (0.2-0.41) L·kg(-1), respectively. Body weight and postnatal age were statistically significant covariates. Cefotaxime-calculated residual concentrations were low, and no patient succeeded in attaining the target. Unlike intermittent administration, a dosing regimen of 100 mg·kg(-1)·day(-1) administered by continuous infusion provided a probability of target attainment of 100%, regardless of age and weight. Standard intermittent cefotaxime dosing regimens in critically ill children are not adequate to reach the target. We showed that, for the same daily dose, continuous infusion was the only administration that enabled the target to be attained, for children over 1 month of age. As continuous administration is achievable in the pediatric intensive care unit, it should be considered for clinical practice. Registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02539407.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Unspecified 6 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,438,306
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#501
of 1,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,901
of 323,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.