↓ Skip to main content

Marijuana: Respiratory Tract Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
Marijuana: Respiratory Tract Effects
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12016-013-8374-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly P. Owen, Mark E. Sutter, Timothy E. Albertson

Abstract

Marijuana is the most commonly used drug of abuse in the USA. It is commonly abused through inhalation and therefore has effects on the lung that are similar to tobacco smoke, including increased cough, sputum production, hyperinflation, and upper lobe emphysematous changes. However, at this time, it does not appear that marijuana smoke contributes to the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Marijuana can have multiple physiologic effects such as tachycardia, peripheral vasodilatation, behavioral and emotional changes, and possible prolonged cognitive impairment. The carcinogenic effects of marijuana are unclear at this time. Studies are mixed on the ability of marijuana smoke to increase the risk for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, lung cancer, prostate cancer, and cervical cancer. Some studies show that marijuana is protective for development of malignancy. Marijuana smoke has been shown to have an inhibitory effect on the immune system. Components of cannabis are under investigation as treatment for autoimmune diseases and malignancy. As marijuana becomes legalized in many states for medical and recreational use, other forms of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) have been developed, such as food products and beverages. As most research on marijuana at this time has been on whole marijuana smoke, rather than THC, it is difficult to determine if the currently available data is applicable to these newer products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 202 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 19%
Student > Master 32 16%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 17 8%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 46 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,863,275
of 24,493,651 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#58
of 696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,481
of 198,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.