You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence that breast cancer risk at the 2q35 locus is mediated through IGFBP5 regulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms5999 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maya Ghoussaini, Stacey L. Edwards, Kyriaki Michailidou, Silje Nord, Richard Cowper-Sal·lari, Kinjal Desai, Siddhartha Kar, Kristine M. Hillman, Susanne Kaufmann, Dylan M. Glubb, Jonathan Beesley, Joe Dennis, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Ed Dicks, Qi Guo, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Mitul Shah, Robert Luben, Judith Brown, Kamila Czene, Hatef Darabi, Mikael Eriksson, Daniel Klevebring, Stig E. Bojesen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Sune F. Nielsen, Henrik Flyger, Diether Lambrechts, Bernard Thienpont, Patrick Neven, Hans Wildiers, Annegien Broeks, Laura J. Van’t Veer, Emiel J. Th Rutgers, Fergus J. Couch, Janet E. Olson, Emily Hallberg, Celine Vachon, Jenny Chang-Claude, Anja Rudolph, Petra Seibold, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Julian Peto, Isabel dos-Santos-Silva, Lorna Gibson, Heli Nevanlinna, Taru A. Muranen, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Per Hall, Jingmei Li, Jianjun Liu, Keith Humphreys, Daehee Kang, Ji-Yeob Choi, Sue K. Park, Dong-Young Noh, Keitaro Matsuo, Hidemi Ito, Hiroji Iwata, Yasushi Yatabe, Pascal Guénel, Thérèse Truong, Florence Menegaux, Marie Sanchez, Barbara Burwinkel, Frederik Marme, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Anna H. Wu, Chiu-chen Tseng, David Van Den Berg, Daniel O. Stram, Javier Benitez, M. Pilar Zamora, Jose Ignacio Arias Perez, Primitiva Menéndez, Xiao-Ou Shu, Wei Lu, Yu-Tang Gao, Qiuyin Cai, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Malcolm W. R. Reed, Irene L. Andrulis, Julia A. Knight, Gord Glendon, Sandrine Tchatchou, Elinor J. Sawyer, Ian Tomlinson, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller, Christopher A. Haiman, Brian E. Henderson, Fredrick Schumacher, Loic Le Marchand, Annika Lindblom, Sara Margolin, Soo Hwang TEO, Cheng Har YIP, Daphne S. C. Lee, Tien Y. Wong, Maartje J. Hooning, John W. M. Martens, J. Margriet Collée, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen, John L. Hopper, Melissa C. Southey, Helen Tsimiklis, Miroslav K. Kapuscinski, Chen-Yang Shen, Pei-Ei Wu, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Shou-Tung Chen, Grethe Grenaker Alnæs, Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale, Graham G. Giles, Roger L. Milne, Catriona McLean, Kenneth Muir, Artitaya Lophatananon, Sarah Stewart-Brown, Pornthep Siriwanarangsan, Mikael Hartman, Hui Miao, Shaik Ahmad Bin Syed Buhari, Yik Ying Teo, Peter A. Fasching, Lothar Haeberle, Arif B. Ekici, Matthias W. Beckmann, Hermann Brenner, Aida Karina Dieffenbach, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Anthony Swerdlow, Alan Ashworth, Nick Orr, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Montserrat García-Closas, Jonine Figueroa, Stephen J. Chanock, Jolanta Lissowska, Jacques Simard, Mark S. Goldberg, France Labrèche, Martine Dumont, Robert Winqvist, Katri Pylkäs, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Hiltrud Brauch, Thomas Brüning, Yon-Dschun Koto, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernardo Bonanni, Sara Volorio, Thilo Dörk, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Sonja Helbig, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Peter Devilee, Robert A. E. M. Tollenaar, Caroline Seynaeve, Christi J. Van Asperen, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Jaworska-Bieniek, Katarzyna Durda, Susan Slager, Amanda E. Toland, Christine B. Ambrosone, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Valerie Gaborieau, Paul Brennan, James McKay, Ute Hamann, Diana Torres, Wei Zheng, Jirong Long, Hoda Anton-Culver, Susan L. Neuhausen, Craig Luccarini, Caroline Baynes, Shahana Ahmed, Mel Maranian, Catherine S. Healey, Anna González-Neira, Guillermo Pita, M. Rosario Alonso, Nuria Álvarez, Daniel Herrero, Daniel C. Tessier, Daniel Vincent, Francois Bacot, Ines de Santiago, Jason Carroll, Carlos Caldas, Melissa A. Brown, Mathieu Lupien, Vessela N. Kristensen, Paul D P Pharoah, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Juliet D French, Douglas F. Easton, Alison M. Dunning |
| Abstract |
GWAS have identified a breast cancer susceptibility locus on 2q35. Here we report the fine mapping of this locus using data from 101,943 subjects from 50 case-control studies. We genotype 276 SNPs using the 'iCOGS' genotyping array and impute genotypes for a further 1,284 using 1000 Genomes Project data. All but two, strongly correlated SNPs (rs4442975 G/T and rs6721996 G/A) are excluded as candidate causal variants at odds against >100:1. The best functional candidate, rs4442975, is associated with oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) disease with an odds ratio (OR) in Europeans of 0.85 (95% confidence interval=0.84-0.87; P=1.7 × 10(-43)) per t-allele. This SNP flanks a transcriptional enhancer that physically interacts with the promoter of IGFBP5 (encoding insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 5) and displays allele-specific gene expression, FOXA1 binding and chromatin looping. Evidence suggests that the g-allele confers increased breast cancer susceptibility through relative downregulation of IGFBP5, a gene with known roles in breast cell biology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Professor | 16 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,955,427
of 25,390,692 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#25,669
of 56,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,054
of 264,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#249
of 659 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 659 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.