↓ Skip to main content

Mastl is required for timely activation of APC/C in meiosis I and Cdk1 reactivation in meiosis II

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mastl is required for timely activation of APC/C in meiosis I and Cdk1 reactivation in meiosis II
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1083/jcb.201406033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepak Adhikari, M. Kasim Diril, Kiran Busayavalasa, Sanjiv Risal, Shoma Nakagawa, Rebecca Lindkvist, Yan Shen, Vincenzo Coppola, Lino Tessarollo, Nobuaki R. Kudo, Philipp Kaldis, Kui Liu

Abstract

In mitosis, the Greatwall kinase (called microtubule-associated serine/threonine kinase like [Mastl] in mammals) is essential for prometaphase entry or progression by suppressing protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) activity. PP2A suppression in turn leads to high levels of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation. We have used a mouse model with an oocyte-specific deletion of Mastl to show that Mastl-null oocytes resume meiosis I and reach metaphase I normally but that the onset and completion of anaphase I are delayed. Moreover, after the completion of meiosis I, Mastl-null oocytes failed to enter meiosis II (MII) because they reassembled a nuclear structure containing decondensed chromatin. Our results show that Mastl is required for the timely activation of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome to allow meiosis I exit and for the rapid rise of Cdk1 activity that is needed for the entry into MII in mouse oocytes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Taiwan 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 34%
Chemistry 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,735,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#869
of 11,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,660
of 262,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#9
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.