↓ Skip to main content

Remembering episodic memories is not necessary for forgetting of negative words: Semantic retrieval can cause forgetting of negative words

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Remembering episodic memories is not necessary for forgetting of negative words: Semantic retrieval can cause forgetting of negative words
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, September 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0719-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masanori Kobayashi, Yoshihiko Tanno

Abstract

Retrieval of a memory can induce forgetting of other related memories, which is known as retrieval-induced forgetting. Although most studies have investigated retrieval-induced forgetting by remembering episodic memories, this also can occur by remembering semantic memories. The present study shows that retrieval of semantic memories can lead to forgetting of negative words. In two experiments, participants learned words and then engaged in retrieval practice where they were asked to recall words related to the learned words from semantic memory. Finally, participants completed a stem-cued recall test for the learned words. The results showed forgetting of neutral and negative words, which was characteristic of semantic retrieval-induced forgetting. A certain degree of overlapping features, except same learning episode, is sufficient to cause retrieval-induced forgetting of negative words. Given the present results, we conclude that retrieval-induced forgetting of negative words does not require recollection of episodic memories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Student > Master 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 52%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%