↓ Skip to main content

Primary Care Tasks Associated with Provider Burnout: Findings from a Veterans Health Administration Survey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Primary Care Tasks Associated with Provider Burnout: Findings from a Veterans Health Administration Survey
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11606-017-4188-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Y. Kim, Danielle E. Rose, Lynn M. Soban, Susan E. Stockdale, Lisa S. Meredith, Samuel T. Edwards, Christian D. Helfrich, Lisa V. Rubenstein

Abstract

The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a primary care delivery model predicated on shared responsibility for patient care among members of an interprofessional team. Effective task sharing may reduce burnout among primary care providers (PCPs). However, little is known about the extent to which PCPs share these responsibilities, and which, if any, of the primary care tasks performed independently by the PCPs (vs. shared with the team) are particularly associated with PCP burnout. A better understanding of the relationship between these tasks and their effects on PCP burnout may help guide focused efforts aimed at reducing burnout. To investigate (1) the extent to which PCPs share responsibility for 14 discrete primary care tasks with other team members, and (2) which, if any, of the primary care tasks performed by the PCPs (without reliance on team members) are associated with PCP burnout. Secondary data analysis of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) survey data from two time periods. 327 providers from 23 VA primary care practices within one VHA regional network. The dependent variable was PCP report of burnout. Independent variables included PCP report of the extent to which they performed 14 discrete primary care tasks without reliance on team members; team functioning; and PCP-, clinic-, and system-level variables. In adjusted models, PCP reports of intervening on patient lifestyle factors and educating patients about disease-specific self-care activities, without reliance on their teams, were significantly associated with burnout (intervening on lifestyle: b = 4.11, 95% CI = 0.39, 7.83, p = 0.03; educating patients: b = 3.83, 95% CI = 0.33, 7.32, p = 0.03). Performing behavioral counseling and self-management education tasks without relying on other team members for assistance was associated with PCP burnout. Expanding the roles of nurses and other healthcare professionals to assume responsibility for these tasks may ease PCP burden and reduce burnout.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 42 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 46 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,428,013
of 23,971,017 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,470
of 7,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,762
of 323,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#22
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,971,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.