| Title |
The effect of natural gas supply on US renewable energy and CO2 emissions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094008 |
| Authors |
Christine Shearer, John Bistline, Mason Inman, Steven J Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 33% |
| Spain | 12 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% |
| Norway | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 100 | 85% |
| Scientists | 12 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Researcher | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 20% |
| Engineering | 22 | 15% |
| Energy | 13 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 368. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#87,277
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#134
of 6,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#721
of 264,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.