You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new framework for analysing automated acoustic species detection data: Occupancy estimation and optimization of recordings post‐processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12910 |
| Authors |
Thierry Chambert, J. Hardin Waddle, David A. W. Miller, Susan C. Walls, James D. Nichols |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,931,729
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,962
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,894
of 342,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#53
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.