| Title |
Developing Age-Friendly Cities: an Evidence-Based Evaluation Tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Population Ageing, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12062-017-9206-2 |
| Authors |
Stefanie Buckner, Daniel Pope, Calum Mattocks, Louise Lafortune, Mukesh Dherani, Nigel Bruce |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 62% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,304,683
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Population Ageing
#28
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,982
of 323,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Population Ageing
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.