↓ Skip to main content

An approach to the management of patients with residual Cushing’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
An approach to the management of patients with residual Cushing’s disease
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11060-009-9888-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lewis S. Blevins, Nader Sanai, Sandeep Kunwar, Jessica K. Devin

Abstract

The evaluation and management of patients with residual Cushing's disease is one of the more complex issues facing neurosurgeons and neuroendocrinologists in clinical practice. There is considerable controversy over several relevant issues such as the timing of the assessment of whether a patient is in remission, what biochemical parameters define remission, the most appropriate course of action to take after residual disease has been defined, etc. As a consequence of the controversies, treating physicians develop notions and fall into certain practice patterns based on evidence of varying levels, their anecdotal experiences, and information gleaned from scientific meetings. This practice pattern, we believe, constitutes the "art of medicine." We conducted a PubMed literature search to identify manuscripts containing data relevant to Cushing's disease, outcomes of various therapeutic modalities, and recurrences. Reference lists were used to identify additional relevant manuscripts. We focused our review on manuscripts that included reasonably large series of patients, those reflecting the experience of pituitary centers and physicians recognized as experts in the field, and those papers felt to represent seminal contributions to the literature. Furthermore, trends in the evaluation and management of relevant patients have been incorporated by the senior author who has seen and evaluated over 750 patients with documented Cushing's syndrome over the past 18 years in clinical practice. An analysis of current evidence indicated that, despite advances in neurosurgical techniques and recent developments in adjuvant therapies, patients with residual Cushing's disease present significant management challenges to treating physicians. In this era, however, it is indeed possible to gain control of the hypercortisolism in most patients. Despite the wide variability in research methodology designed to collect relevant data, a step-wise approach to the management of these patients can be achieved. A logical step-wise approach to the evaluation of postoperative patients with Cushing's disease is essential. Patients with residual disease require the development of an individualized plan of management that takes into account numerous factors pertaining to status of disease, the experience of treating physicians, and available therapeutic modalities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,727,479
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,114
of 2,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,234
of 93,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.