You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CHESS Improves Cancer Caregivers’ Burden and Mood: Results of an eHealth RCT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Psychology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1037/a0034216 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lori L. DuBenske, David H. Gustafson, Kang Namkoong, Robert P. Hawkins, Amy K. Atwood, Roger L. Brown, Ming-Yuan Chih, Fiona McTavish, Cindy L. Carmack, Mary K. Buss, Ramaswamy Govindan, James F. Cleary |
| Abstract |
Informal caregivers (family and friends) of people with cancer are often unprepared for their caregiving role, leading to increased burden or distress. Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS) is a Web-based lung cancer information, communication, and coaching system for caregivers. This randomized trial reports the impact on caregiver burden, disruptiveness, and mood of providing caregivers access to CHESS versus the Internet with a list of recommended lung cancer websites. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 451 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 10% |
| Researcher | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 17% |
| Unknown | 126 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 97 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 11% |
| Unknown | 144 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology
#1,059
of 2,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,667
of 265,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.