| Title |
Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2049-3258-72-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoff Appelboom, Elvis Camacho, Mickey E Abraham, Samuel S Bruce, Emmanuel LP Dumont, Brad E Zacharia, Randy D’Amico, Justin Slomian, Jean Yves Reginster, Olivier Bruyère, E Sander Connolly |
| Abstract |
Innovations in mobile and electronic healthcare are revolutionizing the involvement of both doctors and patients in the modern healthcare system by extending the capabilities of physiological monitoring devices. Despite significant progress within the monitoring device industry, the widespread integration of this technology into medical practice remains limited. The purpose of this review is to summarize the developments and clinical utility of smart wearable body sensors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 645 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 112 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 93 | 14% |
| Researcher | 73 | 11% |
| Other | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 109 | 16% |
| Unknown | 133 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 129 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 104 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 122 | 18% |
| Unknown | 171 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,552,634
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#50
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,570
of 249,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them