↓ Skip to main content

Pseudomonas-aeruginosa-Infektion bei chronisch obstruktiver Lungenerkrankung

Overview of attention for article published in Die Innere Medizin, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Pseudomonas-aeruginosa-Infektion bei chronisch obstruktiver Lungenerkrankung
Published in
Die Innere Medizin, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00108-017-0332-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. G. U. Rohde, T. Welte

Abstract

Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization in the airways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is probably associated with increased mortality and morbidity and a faster progress of COPD, although this has not been conclusively proven by studies. Studies demonstrating an improvement in prognosis in COPD patients by early eradication of Pseudomonas or at least a reduction of the bacterial burden by either inhaled or oral antibiotic maintenance therapy, are missing. An impact on the exacerbation rate has only been shown for macrolide maintenance treatment; however, this effect could be explained by the inclusion of patients with bronchiectasis in the studies. This is a group of patients for whom the effect of this kind of antibiotic treatment is well known. Further studies on the prevention and treatment of chronic Pseudomonas colonization in COPD patients are urgently needed. The stability of the respiratory microbiome probably plays an essential role in the course of the disease and should be established as a study endpoint.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Innere Medizin
#226
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,995
of 330,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Innere Medizin
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.