| Title |
A haplotypic variant at the IRGM locus and rs11747270 are related to the susceptibility for chronic periodontitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Inflammation Research, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00011-017-1101-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthias Folwaczny, Eleni Tsekeri, Jürgen Glas |
| Abstract |
Immunity-regulated GTPase M (IRGM) plays a critical role in the defense against intracellular bacteria by regulating autophagy formation. This direct genetic association study aimed to determine whether variants at the IRGM genetic locus are associated with chronic periodontitis. Using PCR and melting curve analysis 390 periodontitis patients and 770 healthy controls have been genotyped regarding six polymorphisms in the IRGM gene (rs13361189, rs10065172, rs4958847, rs1000113, rs11747270, rs931058). Frequency distribution of alleles and genotypes for the six polymorphisms were not significantly different between the periodontitis and the control group. Also following stratification according to gender and smoking no significant linkage was found for any of the IRGM variants with periodontitis. Analysis of a subsample of patients revealed a significant association for rs11747270 with severe periodontitis (p = 0.003). Pairwise linkage analysis revealed one block composed of rs13361189, rs10065172, rs4958847, rs1000113 and 11747270 with strong or even complete linkage disequilibrium (r (2) > 0.9). Four haplotypes showed a frequency of > 1%, among which the haplotype C-T-A-T-G was significantly associated with chronic periodontitis (p = 0.0051; OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.41-15.42). One rare haplotype of the IRGM locus is significantly associated with chronic periodontitis in a German cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 25% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,449,496
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation Research
#791
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,716
of 322,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation Research
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.