↓ Skip to main content

A case of severe NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) following a dental procedure in a child

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
A case of severe NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) following a dental procedure in a child
Published in
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40368-016-0233-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. King, A. Byrne, P. Fleming

Abstract

An allergic reaction following a dental procedure is a rare event. A local anaesthetic (LA) may initially be suspected as a causative agent but allergy to dental LA solutions is extremely rare. This report concerns a 13 year old child who underwent dental treatment and was exposed to Lignospan Special(®) LA, mouthwash, latex gloves, ibuprofen medication, and a Magnum(®) (almond) ice cream all within 45 min. He subsequently developed acute symptoms of nasal rhinorrhoea, facial flushing, peri-orbital and lip angioedema, followed by throat tightness and wheeze (respiratory compromise). His acute reaction was treated by his medical practitioner with oral anti-histamines, steroid and nebulised salbutamol. The child was referred to a local allergist. The child underwent detailed allergic investigations including skin prick tests, blood tests, incremental local anaesthetic challenge and ibuprofen challenge. The patient was diagnosed with NSAID exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD), a hypersensitivity reaction to ibuprofen. The patient was advised to avoid NSAIDs and to wear a medic-alert (allergy) bracelet. A detailed written report was sent to the patient's dentist and GP. In the context of a suspected reaction post dental procedure, local anaesthetic should be considered a possible allergen but other important considerations include analgesics, antibiotics, and latex. All genuine allergic reactions need to be investigated. This report highlights NERD as a possible adverse outcome following dental treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,449,496
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#239
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,942
of 314,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.