Title |
Interspecies transmission of emotional information via chemosignals: from humans to dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Cognition, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10071-017-1139-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Biagio D’Aniello, Gün Refik Semin, Alessandra Alterisio, Massimo Aria, Anna Scandurra |
Abstract |
We report a study examining interspecies emotion transfer via body odors (chemosignals). Do human body odors (chemosignals) produced under emotional conditions of happiness and fear provide information that is detectable by pet dogs (Labrador and Golden retrievers)? The odor samples were collected from the axilla of male donors not involved in the main experiment. The experimental setup involved the co-presence of the dog's owner, a stranger and the odor dispenser in a space where the dogs could move freely. There were three odor conditions [fear, happiness, and control (no sweat)] to which the dogs were assigned randomly. The dependent variables were the relevant behaviors of the dogs (e.g., approaching, interacting and gazing) directed to the three targets (owner, stranger, sweat dispenser) aside from the dogs' stress and heart rate indicators. The results indicated with high accuracy that the dogs manifested the predicted behaviors in the three conditions. There were fewer and shorter owner directed behaviors and more stranger directed behaviors when they were in the "happy odor condition" compared to the fear odor and control conditions. In the fear odor condition, they displayed more stressful behaviors. The heart rate data in the control and happy conditions were significantly lower than in the fear condition. Our findings suggest that interspecies emotional communication is facilitated by chemosignals. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 15 | 9% |
Spain | 13 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 4% |
Mexico | 5 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 2% |
Germany | 4 | 2% |
Italy | 3 | 2% |
France | 2 | 1% |
Finland | 2 | 1% |
Other | 22 | 14% |
Unknown | 85 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 131 | 81% |
Scientists | 18 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 245 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 41 | 17% |
Researcher | 32 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
Other | 39 | 16% |
Unknown | 57 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 24% |
Psychology | 37 | 15% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 27 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 2% |
Other | 41 | 17% |
Unknown | 70 | 29% |