↓ Skip to main content

Multimodal Residential Treatment for Adolescent Anxiety: Outcome and Associations with Pre-treatment Variables

Overview of attention for article published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Multimodal Residential Treatment for Adolescent Anxiety: Outcome and Associations with Pre-treatment Variables
Published in
Child Psychiatry & Human Development, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10578-017-0762-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie C. Schneider, Valérie La Buissonnière-Ariza, Davíð R. M. A. Højgaard, Brian S. Kay, Bradley C. Riemann, Stephanie C. Eken, Peter Lake, Joshua M. Nadeau, Eric A. Storch

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of a multimodal residential treatment program for severe adolescent anxiety, and examine whether treatment outcome was associated with pre-treatment anxiety, comorbid disorders, or participant age or gender. Participants were 70 adolescents (61.4% female, mean age = 15.4 years) with a primary anxiety disorder who received residential treatment involving cognitive behavioral therapy and medication management. Treatment outcome was assessed both as the change in adolescent-reported anxiety symptoms, and using treatment response criteria. Results indicated a strong effect of the intervention on symptoms of anxiety, depression, and anxiety-related life interference. Most pre-treatment variables were not associated with treatment outcome. However, higher adolescent-reported pre-treatment anxiety was associated with a greater reduction in anxiety at post-treatment, and the presence of a comorbid anxiety disorder was associated with poorer odds of treatment response. Findings indicate that residential treatment is a robust intervention for adolescent anxiety.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 33 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,540,801
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#366
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,859
of 324,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Psychiatry & Human Development
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.