↓ Skip to main content

Zebrafish as a Model for the Study of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes and Their Mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Zebrafish as a Model for the Study of Microvascular Complications of Diabetes and Their Mechanisms
Published in
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, September 2017
DOI 10.3390/ijms18092002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a crucial metabolic disease that leads to severe disorders. These include macrovascular complications such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral artery disease and microvascular complications including diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Diabetes mellitus, along with its associated organ pathologies, is one of the key problems in today's medicine. Zebrafish is an upcoming disease model organism in diabetes research. Its glucose metabolism and the pathways of reactive metabolite formation are very similar to those of humans. Moreover, several physiological and pathophysiological pathways that also exist in humans and other mammals have been identified in this species or are currently under intense investigation. Zebrafish offer sophisticated imaging techniques and allow simple and fast genetic and pharmacological approaches with a high throughput. In this review, we highlight achievements and mechanisms concerning microvascular complications discovered in zebrafish, and we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of zebrafish as a model for studying diabetic complications.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 83 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 87 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#19,159,670
of 27,788,586 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#25,740
of 48,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,578
of 330,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Molecular Sciences
#235
of 437 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 48,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 437 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.