↓ Skip to main content

Familial gliomas: cases in two pairs of brothers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Familial gliomas: cases in two pairs of brothers
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11060-014-1611-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph A. Osorio, Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper, Kyle M. Walsh, Jennifer L. Clarke, Nicholas A. Butowski, Michael D. Prados, Mitchel S. Berger

Abstract

The majority of gliomas are sporadic in origin. Familial gliomas have been reported, though they are exceptionally rare. Several familial cancer syndromes are associated with autosomal dominant glioma risk, typically with incomplete penetrance. When two siblings are affected in the absence of a known dominantly inherited cancer syndrome, an autosomal recessive condition may be suspected (e.g. constitutional mismatch repair syndrome). We present two separate sets of siblings, one set with low grade gliomas, and the other with high grade gliomas. Histology for all tumors were either oligodendroglioma or had features of oligodendroglioma. Interestingly, there is a nearly identical histopathology and anatomical localization noted in these clinical presentations. For one family, genetic testing and family inquiry have resulted in no identifiable genetic pattern of disease. High-penetrance familial mutations and common low-penetrance susceptibility loci (e.g. single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs)) may contribute to familial glioma risk. We present two instances of familial glioma without an identifiable genetic cause. These cases implicate a potential heritable etiology for glioma families in which Mendelian disorders have not been identified. Further investigation should focus on identifying the potential genetic links involved with cases such as the ones presented here.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,232
of 2,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,402
of 238,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#15
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.