↓ Skip to main content

The Health Equity Dimensions of Urban Food Systems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Urban Health, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
428 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Health Equity Dimensions of Urban Food Systems
Published in
Journal of Urban Health, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11524-007-9176-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Dixon, Abiud M. Omwega, Sharon Friel, Cate Burns, Kelly Donati, Rachel Carlisle

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that the nutrition transition sweeping the world's cities is multifaceted. Urban food and nutrition systems are beginning to share similar features, including an increase in dietary diversity, a convergence toward "Western-style" diets rich in fat and refined carbohydrate and within-country bifurcation of food supplies and dietary conventions. Unequal access to the available dietary diversity, calories, and gastronomically satisfying eating experience leads to nutritional inequalities and diet-related health inequities in rich and poor cities alike. Understanding the determinants of inequalities in food security and nutritional quality is a precondition for developing preventive policy responses. Finding common solutions to under- and overnutrition is required, the first step of which is poverty eradication through creating livelihood strategies. In many cities, thousands of positions of paid employment could be created through the establishment of sustainable and self-sufficient local food systems, including urban agriculture and food processing initiatives, food distribution centers, healthy food market services, and urban planning that provides for multiple modes of transport to food outlets. Greater engagement with the food supply may dispel many of the food anxieties affluent consumers are experiencing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 406 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 14%
Researcher 56 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 4%
Other 81 19%
Unknown 76 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 112 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 10%
Environmental Science 39 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 5%
Other 84 20%
Unknown 91 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,845,733
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#276
of 1,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,081
of 92,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.