↓ Skip to main content

Sex-Specific Epigenetics: Implications for Environmental Studies of Brain and Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Sex-Specific Epigenetics: Implications for Environmental Studies of Brain and Behavior
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40572-017-0172-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marija Kundakovic

Abstract

This review discusses the current state of knowledge on sex differences in the epigenetic regulation in the brain and highlights its relevance for the environmental studies of brain and behavior. Recent evidence shows that epigenetic mechanisms are involved in the control of brain sexual differentiation and in memory-enhancing effects of estradiol in females. In addition, several studies have implicated epigenetic dysregulation as an underlying mechanism for sex-specific neurobehavioral effects of environmental exposures. The area of sex-specific neurepigenetics has a great potential to improve our understanding of brain function in health and disease. Future neuropigenetic studies will require the inclusion of males and females and would ideally account for the fluctuating hormonal status in females which is likely to affect the epigenome. The implementation of cutting-edge methods that include epigenomic characterization of specific cell types using latest next-generation sequencing approaches will further advance the area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Psychology 3 14%
Neuroscience 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,750,834
of 24,336,902 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#233
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,253
of 327,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,336,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.