↓ Skip to main content

Frontal Lobe Connectivity and Network Community Characteristics are Associated with the Outcome of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Topography, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Frontal Lobe Connectivity and Network Community Characteristics are Associated with the Outcome of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Brain Topography, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10548-017-0597-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nabin Koirala, Vinzenz Fleischer, Martin Glaser, Kirsten E. Zeuner, Günther Deuschl, Jens Volkmann, Muthuraman Muthuraman, Sergiu Groppa

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is nowadays an evidence-based state of the art therapy option for motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the exact anatomical regions of the cerebral network that are targeted by STN-DBS have not been precisely described and no definitive pre-intervention predictors of the clinical response exist. In this study, we test the hypothesis that the clinical effectiveness of STN-DBS depends on the connectivity profile of the targeted brain networks. Therefore, we used diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and probabilistic tractography to reconstruct the anatomical networks and the graph theoretical framework to quantify the connectivity profile. DWI was obtained pre-operatively from 15 PD patients who underwent DBS (mean age = 67.87 ± 7.88, 11 males, H&Y score = 3.5 ± 0.8) using a 3T MRI scanner (Philips Achieva). The pre-operative connectivity properties of a network encompassing frontal, prefrontal cortex and cingulate gyrus were directly linked to the postoperative clinical outcome. Eccentricity as a topological-characteristic of the network defining how cerebral regions are embedded in relation to distant sites correlated inversely with the applied voltage at the active electrode for optimal clinical response. We found that network topology and pre-operative connectivity patterns have direct influence on the clinical response to DBS and may serve as important and independent predictors of the postoperative clinical outcome.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 19%
Psychology 6 9%
Engineering 5 7%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,530,130
of 24,319,828 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#324
of 506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,986
of 327,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,319,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.