You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of nurses' perceptions of the impact of targeted depression education and a screening and referral tool in an acute cardiac setting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jocn.12703 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chantal F Ski, Sam Munian, John X Rolley, David R Thompson |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to evaluate nurses' perceptions of an education programme and screening and referral tool designed for cardiac nurses to facilitate depression screening and referral procedures for patients with coronary heart disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 17% |
| Psychology | 9 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,088,269
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,498
of 5,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,242
of 263,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#43
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.