| Title |
The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-004-2233-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Feissel, Frédéric Michard, Jean-Pierre Faller, Jean-Louis Teboul |
| Abstract |
To investigate whether the respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter (DeltaD(IVC)) could be related to fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 516 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 87 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 79 | 15% |
| Researcher | 76 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 7% |
| Other | 122 | 23% |
| Unknown | 86 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 376 | 70% |
| Engineering | 12 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 3% |
| Unknown | 100 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,527,517
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,946
of 4,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,594
of 57,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.