↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D: Recent Advances and Implications for Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
81 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D: Recent Advances and Implications for Athletes
Published in
Sports Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0266-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua J. Todd, L. Kirsty Pourshahidi, Emeir M. McSorley, Sharon M. Madigan, Pamela J. Magee

Abstract

Athletes may be predisposed to low vitamin D concentrations, with studies reporting a high prevalence of athletes with a vitamin D concentration below 50 nmol/L across a range of sports and geographical locations, particularly over the winter months. It is well documented that vitamin D is important for osseous health by enhancing calcium absorption at the small intestine; however, emerging research suggests that vitamin D may also benefit a plethora of extra-skeletal target tissues and systems. There is strong evidence that vitamin D is capable of regulating both innate and adaptive immune processes via binding of active vitamin D to its complementary receptor. Supplementation with vitamin D may also enhance skeletal muscle function through morphological adaptations and enhanced calcium availability during cross-bridge cycling; however, an exact mechanism of action is yet to be elucidated. Such findings have prompted research into the importance of maintaining vitamin D concentrations over wintertime and the possible physiological and immunological benefits of vitamin D supplementation in athletes. The following review critically evaluates existing literature and presents novel perspectives on how vitamin D may enhance athletic performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 18%
Student > Master 35 18%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 48 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 41 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#646,482
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#611
of 2,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,540
of 262,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#17
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.