You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mobile decision-tree tool technology as a means to detect wildlife crimes and build enforcement networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.08.018 |
| Authors |
Heidi E. Kretser, Ramacandra Wong, Scott Roberton, Carrianne Pershyn, JianMing Huang, Fuping Sun, Aili Kang, Peter Zahler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Madagascar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 42 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#952,543
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#837
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,659
of 280,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#8
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.